We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 05 May 20
SUPRAMAXES: YTD SLIDE HAS BEEN 45%, WITH THE AVERAGE FOR 2020 TCA HOLDING AT US$5,793 - ALLIED
It has been almost three months since the WHO officially categorized the current coronavirus outbreak as a global pandemic, an outbreak that has br ...
Monday, 04 May 20
U.S. ESTIMATED COAL PRODUCTION FALL 39.4% YEAR ON YEAR IN THE WEEK ENDED APRIL 25 - EIA
Estimated U.S. coal production totaled about 8.6 million short tons (MMst) For the week ended April 25, 2020, says EIA in its latest report.
E ...
Saturday, 02 May 20
SUPRAMAX: ASIA, STRONGER NUMBERS - A 55.000-DWT WAS FIXED FROM INDONESIA TO CHINA IN THE MID $6,000S - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A tepid week for the big ships, as macro concerns continued to weigh heavily on the index. All of the major voyage routes lost value, ...
Friday, 01 May 20
KOSPO INVITED OFFER FOR 5600 NCV COAL FOR Q3 2020 LOADING
COALspot.com: Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO) has issued an International tender for 260,000 Metric Tons (MT) steam coal for Boryeong Power ...
Friday, 01 May 20
GLOBAL COAL DEMAND TO FALL BY ABOUT 8% IN 2020,THE LARGEST DROP SINCE WORLD WAR II - IEA
We expect global coal demand to fall by about 8% in 2020, the largest drop since World War II, with coal use declining in virtually every sector of ...
|
|
|
Showing 991 to 995 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
|
| |
| |
|
