We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 01 May 20
GLOBAL COAL DEMAND TO FALL BY 8% IN Q1 2020 RELATIVE TO Q1 2019 - IEA
We expect global coal demand to fall by 8% in Q1 2020 relative to Q1 2019. This significant drop was driven by lower demand in the electricity sect ...
Friday, 01 May 20
LUKOIL SHARES LUBRICANT EXPERIENCE AFTER FIRST 100 DAYS OF OPERATION ON VLSFO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
After 100 days of VLSFO operation, LUKOIL Marine Lubricants is sharing recent experience on VLSFO operation with NAVIGO M ...
Wednesday, 29 April 20
OIL CLOSES IN ON PEAK OVERSUPPLY - WOOD MACKENZIE
Are we now deep in the abyss? Up to our necks in it, if the oil price is any guide. Brent has now tested sub-US$20/bbl in this downturn and WTI sub ...
Monday, 27 April 20
INCIDENT INVESTIGATION: SEARCH FOR THE CAUSE, NOT THE VILLAIN - GARD
Incident investigations often conclude with placing the blame for an incident on the crew. Causes of the incidents are usually identified as proced ...
Monday, 27 April 20
A 58,000DWT VESSEL WAS FIXED DELIVERY SINGAPORE TRIP VIA INDONESIA, RE-DELIVERY WC INDIA, AT $4,500 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The tide turned this week for the Capesize market, as voyage rates registered dramatically falling fuel costs. This was led primarily ...
|
|
|
Showing 996 to 1000 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
