We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 24 April 20
COAL INDIA TO PRODUCE 710 MT COAL - MINISTER OF COAL AND MINES
Coal India Limited (CIL) will produce 710 million tonnes (MT) of coal and company’s coal off take target will also remain at710 MT for this f ...
Friday, 24 April 20
CHINA COAL PRODUCER YANZHOU COAL POSTS 9.6 PCT RISE IN 2019 NET PROFIT - XINHUA
China’s major coal producer Yanzhou Coal Mining Co., Ltd. said Thursday that its net profit saw a 9.6 percent rise in 2019.
Th ...
Tuesday, 21 April 20
INDONESIA ACCOUNTS FOR 19% OF JAPAN'S TOTAL COAL IMPORTS - BANCHERO COSTA
Coal trade in Asia is proving remarkably resilient this year, despite the global economic impact from COVID-19.
We have seen China&r ...
Tuesday, 21 April 20
COVID-19: CHARTERPARTY MATTERS FOR SHIPOWNERS - SKULD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Whilst the plight of cruise ships, stranded off shore with sick passengers and crew, may be dominating media headlines, t ...
Monday, 20 April 20
SUPRAMAX: A 52,000DWT SHIP FIXING AN INDONESIA COAL RUN TO CHINA AT $4400 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
This week was the strongest period seen for the Capesize market in several months. All routes globally succumbed to improved sentiment ...
|
|
|
Showing 1006 to 1010 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Australian Coal Association
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
