We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 07 May 20
CRUDE OIL TANKER EARNINGS DROP 68% IN NINE DAYS - BIMCO
Crude oil tanker earnings have come down sharply in recent weeks with Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC) earnings from the Middle East Gulf to China d ...
Thursday, 07 May 20
UKRAINE PRODUCES 2.5 MLN TONNES OF COAL IN APRIL - UKRINFORM
Ukraine produced 2.5 million tonnes of coal in April 2020, which is 39% less than planned, according to the Coal Miners Union of Ukraine.
  ...
Thursday, 07 May 20
INDIA: GOVT TO DO AWAY WITH MANDATORY WASHING OF COAL FOR THERMAL POWER UNITS - BUSINESS STANDARD
The Centre is planning to do away with the mandatory requirement of washing of coal before it is transported to thermal power stations. The Ministr ...
Thursday, 07 May 20
CIL'S SUPPLY TO POWER SECTOR FALLS IN MARCH AMID SLUMP IN COAL DEMAND - PTI
The supply of coal to the power sector by state-owned CIL registered a decline of eight per cent to 42.30 million tonne in March in the wake of slu ...
Thursday, 07 May 20
COAL PRICE REFERENCE FALL SHARPLY IN MAY 2020 DUE TO CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down the benchmark price of Indonesian thermal ...
|
|
|
Showing 981 to 985 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Planning Commission, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
|
| |
| |
|