We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 12 May 20
A GLOBAL ECONOMIC RESTART HAS SLOWLY BEGUN AS COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD GRADUALLY - ALLIED
A global economic restart has slowly begun as countries around the world gradually set their return back to “normality”. Yet by all mea ...
Tuesday, 12 May 20
CAN INDONESIA'S COAL INDUSTRY SURVIVE COVID-19? : IEEFA
Pandemic Lockdown and Slumping Prices Put Extreme Pressure on Coal Miners
Executive Summary
While attention has been focused on th ...
Tuesday, 12 May 20
INDIA'S COAL PRODUCTION TO CLOCK RECORD 700 MILLION TONNES IN FY21: COAL SECRETARY - PTI
Coal Secretary Anil Jain said FY20 coal production was lower than the target of 660 million tonnes because of flooding of a key coal mine.
&nbs ...
Monday, 11 May 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE DROPS SLIGHTLY - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price dropped slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge ...
Monday, 11 May 20
CORONAVIRUS PUTS MORE THAN A THIRD OF SEABORNE COAL SUPPLY AT RISK - WOOD MACKENZIE
The full impact of the coronavirus outbreak on the global economy is yet unclear. However, the demand destruction is already becoming evident, with ...
|
|
|
Showing 971 to 975 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
|
| |
| |
|
