We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 09 May 20
ANGLO AMERICAN CONSIDERS SPINNING OFF SOUTH AFRICAN COAL OPERATIONS - REUTERS
Diversified miner Anglo American said on Thursday it prefers unbundling and listing its thermal coal operations in South Africa on the Johannesburg ...
Friday, 08 May 20
THE COLLAPSE OF THE OIL AND BUNKER FUEL MARKETS IN EARLY 2020 - PETER SAND
The sulphur regulation from the International Maritime Organization (IMO) that came into force on 1 January 2020 took the centre stage in the shipp ...
Friday, 08 May 20
LNG DEMAND FACED SEVERAL HEADWINDS IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2020 - GASLOG
LNG demand faced several headwinds in the first quarter of 2020 including a warmer than average winter in the northern hemisphere, high inventory l ...
Thursday, 07 May 20
IEEFA UPDATE: THE OUTLOOK FOR THERMAL COAL IN SOUTHEAST ASIA AND SOUTH ASIA
Seven headwinds are building to sustained growth in coal in Asia
The medium term outlook for thermal coal in Southeast Asia is posit ...
Thursday, 07 May 20
IMO 2020: BUNKER CLAIMS HANDLING GUIDE FOR A NEW DECADE - THE STANDARD CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
IMO 2020 is the term generally used to describe the following regulations under Annex VI of the International Convention ...
|
|
|
Showing 976 to 980 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Australian Coal Association
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Planning Commission, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
