We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 17 June 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
After experiencing record earnings during the first half of the year, the focus of headlines concerning the tanker market has shifted from the deve ...
Wednesday, 17 June 20
KOREA SOUTHERN POWER CO INVITED 80000 MT OF LOW CALORIFIC VALUE COAL FOR AUGUST 1H, 2020 LOADING
COALspot.com: Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO) has issued an International tender for 80,000 Metric Tons (MT) Min 4,200 kcal/kg - Max. ...
Tuesday, 16 June 20
A GLOBAL ECONOMIC SLUMP: WHAT WILL IT MEAN FOR METALS AND MINING? - WOOD MACKENZIE
Back before coronavirus knocked “normal” out cold, the key issues for miners were sub-investment prices, rising requirements for ESG an ...
Tuesday, 16 June 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.58 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 124.43 points Monday, up 0.58 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Tuesday, 16 June 20
HIGHER IRON ORE PRICES OFFSET CORONAVIRUS-DRIVEN PRODUCTION RISK - FITCH RATINGS
Lower iron ore production in Brazil, resulting from rising coronavirus infections, should only marginally affect the cash flow of Vale and other gl ...
|
|
|
Showing 906 to 910 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
|
| |
| |
|
