We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 24 June 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The World Bank estimates that the global economy will fall by 5.2% this year, underlining that the Covid-19 pandemic has had rapid and massive cons ...
Tuesday, 23 June 20
COVID-19 COULD CAUSE A BOOM IN COAL POWER - RYSTAD ENERGY | OILPRICE
COVID-19 has not only impacted the energy industry’s revenues but also its infrastructure development.
The delay of new natural gas ...
Tuesday, 23 June 20
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT UP 0.9 PCT IN JANUARY-MAY: XINHUA
Output of raw coal in China rose 0.9 percent year on year to 1.47 billion tonnes in the first five months of this year, official data showed.
& ...
Monday, 22 June 20
KAMSARMAX TYPES REGULARLY HIT THE $9,000 PER DAY LEVEL FOR INDONESIAN COAL RUN TO CHINA, BALTIC BRIEFING SAYS
Capesize
The Capesize market trajectory this week has been one of the steepest rallies the sector has experienced. Opening at $12,410, the sect ...
Saturday, 20 June 20
WORLD OIL DEMAND IS PROJECTED TO DECREASE BY 9.1 MB/D IN 2020 - OPEC
Crude Oil Price Movements
Spot crude oil prices rebounded in May from low levels registered a month earlier, as physical market fundamentals im ...
|
|
|
Showing 896 to 900 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
|
| |
| |
|
