We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 11 June 20
JAN-MAY, INDONESIA SHIPPED 175.15 MILLION TONS OF COAL TO ITS OVERSEAS BUYERS
Indonesia's coal production for the first 5 months of this year have reached 228 million tons. January – May 2020, Indonesia shipped US$ ...
Thursday, 11 June 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES UP - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price rose slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Wednesday, 10 June 20
OPEC+ CUTS EXTENSION TO ACCELERATE MARKET REBALANCING - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings-London-08 June 2020: The OPEC+ agreement to extend by one month record oil production cuts should accelerate market rebalancing, Fitc ...
Wednesday, 10 June 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
In contrast to the economic projections of the past two years for the first half of 2020, the oil & gas industry and those involved in it faced ...
Wednesday, 10 June 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.19 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 123.71 points Monday, down 0.19 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
|
|
|
Showing 916 to 920 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Coal Association
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
