We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 16 June 20
SHALE SHOCKED - WOOD MACKENZIE
Capturing shut-ins in real time
Oil markets are searching for balance as the world reflects on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. ...
Sunday, 14 June 20
INDONESIAN COAL WAS STILL IN DEMAND; A 52,000-DWT SUPRAMAX FIXING DELIVERY CJK FOR A ROUND VOYAGE VIA INDONESIA AT $6,250 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market made new highs for the year this week after strong iron ore demand to the far east continued to develop in the mar ...
Friday, 12 June 20
CHINA CURBS COAL IMPORTS AFTER 5 MONTHS OF RECORD INFLOWS - SOURCES: REUTERS
China has stepped up customs checks for coal imports, leading to lengthy processing delays at ports, four sources familiar with the matter said, as ...
Friday, 12 June 20
COAL INDIA LIMITED SET FOR MARKETING DRIVE TO CREATE DEMAND - FINANCIAL EXPRESS
State-run miner Coal India (CIL), which is primarily focused on supplying coal to the power sector, is now reorienting its marketing to create dema ...
Friday, 12 June 20
MOODY'S REVISES BRENT OIL PRICE OUTLOOK TO $35/BARREL IN 2020 - TASS
Low oil prices are likely to exert the highest pressure on Iraq, Oman and Kuwait due to the limited space for the fiscal policy pursuit and higher ...
|
|
|
Showing 911 to 915 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
