We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 01 August 20
SHIP SHAPE - OUCH: FIS
Thursday afternoon saw a report that US GDP in Q2 shrank by 32.9%. Now this may have beaten expectations, but it’s a bit like saying that you ...
Saturday, 01 August 20
ASIA HOPE FOR LONG-TERM OIL DEMAND - BALTIC BRIEFING
Oil demand in Asia Pacific might be expected to plunge 1.8m barrels per day (bpd) this year, but there are still strong prospects for growth over t ...
Friday, 31 July 20
SHORT-TERM IMPACT ON THE CHEMICAL SHIPPING MARKET IF THE INDIA-CHINA DISPUTE ESCALATES - DREWRY
Due to the India-China dispute, the threat of deteriorating trade relations between the two countries has become real. Meanwhile, we expect freight ...
Friday, 31 July 20
PANAMAX: THE PERIOD MARKET REMAINS QUIET WITH FEW FIXTURES REPORTED - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
After weeks of dropping rates, there are finally some resistance for the Capes. Pacific rounds improving to upper15,000s by the middle ...
Friday, 31 July 20
PANDEMIC SENDING SOUTH AFRICAN COAL INDUSTRY TO EARLIER GRAVE - IEEFA
Could South Africa’s coal export industry, one of the largest in the world, be about to take a severe hit from the coronavirus?
...
|
|
|
Showing 851 to 855 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The University of Queensland
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
|
| |
| |
|
