We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 05 August 20
SLUMP IN OIL REVENUE CHALLENGES MIDDLE EAST OIL EXPORTERS - INTERMODAL
The Covid-19 pandemic has had far-reaching consequences on the global capital markets. Despite the US government’s efforts for a quick and de ...
Tuesday, 04 August 20
KOEN INVITED BIDS FOR TOTAL 900K MT OF MIN 5600 NCV COAL FOR 3 YEARS
COALspot.com: South Korea’s KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. (KOEN) has issued an international tender for 260,000 to 300,000 Tons (MT) min. ...
Tuesday, 04 August 20
THE WORLD’S FLEET OF COAL-FIRED POWER STATIONS HAS GOT SMALLER FOR THE FIRST TIME ON RECORD, WITH MORE CAPACITY RETIRED IN THE FIRST HALF OF 2020 THAN THE AMOUNT OPENED - IEA
This is according to the latest Global Coal Plant Tracker (GCPT) results by Global Energy Monitor (GEM), which we completed last month and report f ...
Monday, 03 August 20
U.S. COAL CONSUMPTION, WHICH HAS DECLINED SINCE ITS 2007 PEAK, FELL TO ITS LOWEST POINT IN APRIL 2020 - EIA
According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) most recent Monthly Energy Review, the United States consumed 6.5 quadrillion ...
Monday, 03 August 20
LOW OIL PRICE AND CORONA VIRUS HIT SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA OIL PRODUCERS - FITCH RATINGS
The collapse in oil prices and the coronavirus shock is worsening the fiscal and external balances of sub-Saharan African oil producers, Fitch Rati ...
|
|
|
Showing 846 to 850 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Coal Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- The University of Queensland
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
