We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 31 July 20
BOTSWANA PLANS MORE COAL-FIRED POWER AS AFRICAN SOLAR ACCELERATES - IEEFA
An African economic leader like Botswana should embrace solar to reduce subsidies and tariff hikes
As Sub-Saharan solar ambition has ...
Wednesday, 29 July 20
2019 U.S. COAL PRODUCTION FALLS TO ITS LOWEST LEVEL SINCE 1978 - EIA
In 2019, U.S. coal production totaled 706 million short tons (MMst), a 7% decrease from the 756 MMst mined in 2018. Last year’s production wa ...
Wednesday, 29 July 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The dry bulk sector is beginning to recover from reduced SnP activity recorded in the first quarter of 2020. The table below illustrates that appro ...
Tuesday, 28 July 20
DEUTSCHE BANK TO END GLOBAL BUSINESS ACTIVITIES IN COAL MINING BY 2025 - REUTERS
Deutsche Bank, in a revamp of its policies for fossil fuels, said on Monday that it would end business activities worldwide related to coal mining ...
Monday, 27 July 20
IEEFA ENERGY FINANCE CONFERENCE 2020: COAL, LNG, PETROCHEMICAL SECTORS FACE POOR OUTLOOK AND UPHILL BATTLE FOR INVESTORS
Fossil fuel industries were becoming less financially attractive even before the global coronavirus pandemic
Three major fossil fuel ...
|
|
|
Showing 856 to 860 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Planning Commission, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- The University of Queensland
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
