We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 07 August 20
PEABODY'S $1.42 BILLION WRITE-DOWN CONCEDES COAL MINES HAVE LITTLE VALUE AND DIM FUTURE - IEEFA
Trouble at biggest mine in Powder River Basin speaks volumes about state of industry
Peabody Energy, the world’s largest priva ...
Thursday, 06 August 20
SUPRAMAX MARKET CONTINUED SIDEWAYS TREND, AND LITTLE INSPIRING NEWS APPEAR - FEARNLEYS
Capesize
There is presently a small correction in rates, but overall levels are up from previous week mainly due to increased demand in the Eas ...
Thursday, 06 August 20
KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER INVITING BIDS FOR MIN 3,600-MAX 3,800 NCV COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea’s KOREA SOUTH-EAST POWER CO., LTD. (KOEN) inviting bids for 80,000 Tons (MT) Min 3,600~Max 3,800 kcal/kg NCV coal f ...
Wednesday, 05 August 20
NO NEW MINING LICENSES - A REMINDER TO GOVERNORS IN INDONESIA - SSEK
Indonesia’s acting Director General of Mining and Coal (“DGMC”) has issued a letter to the country’s provincial Governors t ...
Wednesday, 05 August 20
AUGUST 2020 HBA HITTING ITS LOWEST LEVELS IN HISTORY
COALspot.com: The Indonesia Coal Price Reference for the month of August plunged 30.73% YoY, hitting its lowest levels in history and highlighting ...
|
|
|
Showing 841 to 845 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Planning Commission, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|