We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 18 September 20
INDIA'S COAL-FIRED POWER OUTPUT PICKS UP AS INDUSTRIAL USE RISES - REUTERS
India’s coal-fired electricity generation rose 9.4% in the first half of September, provisional government data showed, as demand from indust ...
Friday, 18 September 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES UP - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price rose slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Thursday, 17 September 20
LAST HOPES FOR DEMAND GROWTH SET TO DISAPPOINT THERMAL COAL EXPORTERS - IEEFA
Asian thermal coal exporters are fighting an uphill battle even in new markets
The world’s largest thermal coal exporter is eyeing new m ...
Wednesday, 16 September 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Another active week in terms of SnP has concluded in the dry bulk market with a diversified array of transactions recorded. Despite the correction ...
Friday, 11 September 20
IMO 2020: A REVIEW OF THE TRANSITION TO VLSFOS - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Many predictions were made in the run up to the imposition of the MARPOL 2020 sulphur cap, none of which was that the tra ...
|
|
|
Showing 781 to 785 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The University of Queensland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Planning Commission, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
