We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 09 September 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The uneventful summer lull which is coming to an end soon has left its stigma on the newbuilding market, which has already been devastated by the g ...
Saturday, 05 September 20
INDIA WON'T KICK ITS COAL HABIT SO EASILY - HINDU BUSINESS LINE
India has traditionally considered itself lucky to have been endowed with abundant coal reserves, which it has sought to use to meet its energy nee ...
Saturday, 05 September 20
FINANCING COMPLETE FOR 900MW FIFTH PHASE OF MASSIVE DUBAI SOLAR PARK: ARABIAN BUSINESS
Saudi-based ACWA Power on Thursday announced it has completed the signing of all financing agreements for the fifth phase of the Mohammed bin Rashi ...
Saturday, 05 September 20
POLISH COAL DEMAND EXPECTED TO FALL BY 7 MLN TONNES NEXT YEAR: MINISTER - REUTERS
Poland’s demand for coal is expected to fall by around 7 million tonnes next year, or more than 10% of annual hard coal production, after a d ...
Saturday, 05 September 20
PAKISTAN'S NEW 27-YEAR POWER PLAN RISKS LOCKING IN LONG-TERM OVERCAPACITY, LEAVING IMPORTED COAL AND LNG PLANTS STRANDED - IEEFA
Wind and solar, the country’s cheapest source of new generation, also overlooked
Pakistan risks locking itself into building m ...
|
|
|
Showing 791 to 795 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Planning Commission, India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
|
| |
| |
|
