We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 September 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Spot rates for Capesize bulk carriers received a significant boost last week, however, there are certain reservations in the market regarding the p ...
Tuesday, 29 September 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.73 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 125.91 points Monday, up 0.73 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Tuesday, 29 September 20
SHIPPING MARKET - ALLIED
Here we are, just a short breath before the final quarter of the year, and many are now debating to what extent we can really expect a firm dry bul ...
Tuesday, 29 September 20
INDONESIAN COAL COMPANIES' EARNINGS TO WEAKEN IN 2H20 - FITCH RATINGS
Rated Indonesian coal miners and contractors will have weaker operating and financial performances in the second half of 2020 than in the first, sa ...
Tuesday, 29 September 20
RUSSIA'S COAL PRODUCTION TO DROP BY 10.5% IN 2020, SAYS MINISTRY - TASS
Russia’s Economic Development Ministry projects a 10.5% decrease in coal production in the country in 2020 compared with last year to 395 mln ...
|
|
|
Showing 771 to 775 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The University of Queensland
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
|
| |
| |
|
