We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 10 September 20
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION IN 2020 TO BE 511 MMST, 28 PER CENT LOWER THAN IN 2019 - EIA
EIA expects total U.S. coal production in 2020 to be 511 million short tons (MMst), 194 MMst (28%) lower than in 2019. Mitigation efforts related t ...
Thursday, 10 September 20
DRY BULK SHIPPING: CHINA'S DEMAND KEEPING THE DRY BULK MARKET GOING - PETER SAND | BIMCO
Overview
An impressive recovery in Chinese dry bulk imports has protected the industry from the effects of falling demand in the rest of the wo ...
Thursday, 10 September 20
TANKER SHIPPING: FREIGHT RATES BACK AT LOSS-MAKING LEVELS AFTER 12 VERY PROFITABLE MONTHS - BIMCO
Overview
A stunningly strong 12 months for the tanker shipping industry is now being replaced by lower freight rates, as lower oil product ...
Thursday, 10 September 20
INDIA'S COAL IMPORTS STUMBLE IN AUGUST, RAISING RISK OF SLOW RECOVERY - REFINITIV | BANCHERO COSTA
After posting a mild recovery in July, India's coal imports have stumbled in August as the South Asian nation battles to restart it ...
Thursday, 10 September 20
THE FIRST 8 MONTHS OF 2020, INDONESIA EXPORTED 217.4 MLN TONNES OF COAL BASED ON REFINITIV - BANCHERO COSTA
The coal market has been hit by a weaker global economy as a result of COVID-19 pandemic and falling industrial electricity demand ...
|
|
|
Showing 786 to 790 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
