We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 October 20
INDIA: THE COMMERCIALISATION OF COAL BLOCKS WILL BENEFIT THE ECONOMY - HINDU BUSINESS LINE
As the government of India receives 76 bids for 23 coal mines against the 38 up on auction, what does this commercialisation of coal block allocati ...
Wednesday, 21 October 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The second wave of COVID-19 is now a reality; offices are closing again, and stricter rules and regulations are being implemented in public spaces. ...
Tuesday, 20 October 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.82 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 127.49 points Monday, up 0.82 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Tuesday, 20 October 20
BIMCO 'SHIPLEASE' TERM SHEET - WATSON FARLEY & WILLIAMS
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The ever-growing importance of sale and leaseback transactions as an alternative to financing ships by way of loan, makes ...
Friday, 16 October 20
KOMIPO ON BEHALF OF K GENCO'S INVITED BIDS FOR TOTAL 715,000 MT MIN. 5,700 NAR COAL FOR DECEMBER
COALspot.com: Korea Midland Power Co., Ltd (KOMIPO) on behalf of EWP, KOSPO, KOSEP and KOWEPO has issued an international tender for total 715,000& ...
|
|
|
Showing 756 to 760 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Minerals Council of Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
|
| |
| |
|
