We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 02 November 20
PHILIPPINES GOVERNMENT SAYS NO TO NEW COAL PLANT PROPOSALS - IEEFA | 24 PILIPINAS
The Duterte administration will no longer accept proposals to construct new coal power plants, a dramatic shift in energy policy that counts on dec ...
Sunday, 01 November 20
GRADUAL RECOVERY FOR INDONESIAN COAL FROM 4Q20; RISKS REMAIN - FITCH RATINGS
Fitch Ratings expects the credit metrics of Indonesian coal miners and coal contractors to improve from 4Q20 with the recovery in volumes and price ...
Wednesday, 28 October 20
BIODIESEL - NEW FUELS, NEW CHALLENGES - GARD | DNV GL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
One of numerous possible ways to comply with the IMO’s strategy on the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ...
Wednesday, 28 October 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.35 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 127.94 points Monday, up 0.35 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Wednesday, 28 October 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The global strive towards eco-friendliness and environmental sustainability in the shipping industry is mounting. There are currently almost 200 co ...
|
|
|
Showing 746 to 750 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PTC India Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
