We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 27 October 20
PLN STILL REFUSING TO ADAPT, A MOVE WHICH WILL HURT INVESTORS, CONSUMERS, AND THE GOVERNMENT PURSE - IEEFA
Utility’s latest planning report locks PLN into the past
PLN would be better served restructuring its business to address the current en ...
Monday, 26 October 20
'LONG ASCENT' TO RECOVERY OF GLOBAL GROWTH - BALTIC EXCHANGE
The global economy has so far avoided a “financial catastrophe” but growth projections from the International Monetary Fund’s lat ...
Friday, 23 October 20
SHIPPING LOANS AND COLLATERAL DAMAGE - VICTOR ONYEGBADO, AKABOGU & ASSOCIATES
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Shipping finance transactions are characterised by peculiar risk factors principally on account of the shipping asset&rsq ...
Friday, 23 October 20
WHAT WILL THE 2020 ELECTIONS MEAN FOR US ENERGY? - WOOD MACKENZIE
The 2020 elections present American voters with a choice between two radically different visions for the future of energy. President Donald Trump r ...
Wednesday, 21 October 20
BRAZIL EXPORTED 238.7 MLN TONNES OF IRON ORE IN THE FIRST 9 MONTHS OF 2020 - BANCHERO COSTA
Brazil’s iron ore exports have been gradually but steadily recovering following a disastrous winter period of 2019/2020. In the first 9 month ...
|
|
|
Showing 751 to 755 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
|
| |
| |
|
