We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 07 October 20
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION TO DECREASE BY 26 PERCENT IN 2020 COMPARED TO 2019 - EIA
EIA expects total U.S. coal production in 2020 to be 525 million short tons (MMst), compared with 705 MMst in 2019, a 26% decrease.
COVID-19 a ...
Wednesday, 07 October 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The challenges brought forward in 2020 proved to be very different from what we could have ever imagined. Together with placing a significant strai ...
Tuesday, 06 October 20
KOSPO TO IMPORT 80,000 MT OF 3,800 NCV COAL FOR 2H NOV
COALspot.com: Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO) has issued an International tender for 80,000 MT Min.3800 kcal/kg NCV coal 2H November, 2020 l ...
Friday, 02 October 20
THE INDONESIA COAL PRICE REFERENCE RISE AFTER HISTORIC CRASH TO US$ 49.42
COALspot.com: The Indonesia Coal Price Reference for the month of October Rise to US$ 51.00 after historic crash to US$ 49.42 in September 2020.
...
Friday, 02 October 20
SRI LANKA MUST LEARN LESSONS FROM AROUND ASIA TO AVOID FURTHER ELECTRICITY CRISES - IEEFA
Overcommitment to fossil-fuelled power generation is leading to excess capacity and rising capacity payments, subsidies, and tariffs around the con ...
|
|
|
Showing 766 to 770 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
|
| |
| |
|
