We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 November 20
AUSTRALIAN COAL EXPORTS TO CHINA SLUMP, BUT PRICES ARE MIXED - REUTERS
China’s unofficial ban on coal imports from Australia is starting to take its toll on volumes, with departing cargoes down sharply so far in ...
Friday, 13 November 20
SHIPPING OUTLOOK TURNS STABLE ON EBITDA GROWTH, IMPROVING SUPPLY-DEMAND BALANCE - MOODY’S
Outlook revised to stable from negative.
The global shipping industry is on course to perform better overall than we had previously ex ...
Friday, 13 November 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES UP - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price rose slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Monday, 09 November 20
INDONESIA MAY CUT BIODIESEL USE TARGET AS SUBSIDY FUND DEPLETES - FITCH
The Indonesian government may rein in its push to increase use of biodiesel as it now comes at higher cost following a fall in crude oil prices and ...
Monday, 09 November 20
SOUTH AFRICA: COAL MARKET CONDITIONS HAVE ' DETERIORATED MATERIALLY' - IEEFA
The Asian seaborne thermal coal pool is drying out
Resource Generation Ltd’s proposed but long delayed Boikarabelo coal mine i ...
|
|
|
Showing 736 to 740 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The University of Queensland
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
