We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 25 November 20
DRY BULK SHIPPING: CHINA REMAINS THE DRIVING FACTOR, BUT COAL POLICY IS DISRUPTING THE MARKET - PETER SAND, BIMCO
The second half of the year has provided some cheer for the dry bulk market, with all ships in the spot market averaging earnings above the break-e ...
Wednesday, 25 November 20
CHINA KICKS AN OWN GOAL WITH AUSTRALIAN COAL - FORBES
China’s annoyance at Australia’s hardline stance on political interference and demands for an independent inquiry into the root cause o ...
Wednesday, 25 November 20
MINISTER - INDONESIA JAN-OCT COAL OUTPUT AT 459 MILLION TONNES - REUTERS
Indonesia coal output in the January to October period was 459 million tonnes, the country’s energy minister told parliament on Monday.
& ...
Wednesday, 25 November 20
INDIA: MORE STEPS NEEDED TO MAKE COMMERCIAL COAL MINING ATTRACTIVE TO GLOBAL PLAYERS - LIVEMINT
India concluded its first commercial coal mine auctions earlier this month. A total of 19 coal mines spread across Madhya Pradesh, Jharkhand, Odish ...
Wednesday, 25 November 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.38 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 129.21 points Monday, up 0.38 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
|
|
|
Showing 726 to 730 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PTC India Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Planning Commission, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- White Energy Company Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The University of Queensland
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
