We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 25 November 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Over 90% of the world’s goods are transported by sea. LPG is a clean, energy efficient and portable fuel that is being marketed at an afforda ...
Friday, 20 November 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES UP - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price rose slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Thursday, 19 November 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As we are moving towards the end of the year, the overall deal landscape of the dry bulk sector corresponding to the second half of 2020 (up to dat ...
Tuesday, 17 November 20
COAL SQUEEZE INTENSIFIES - BALTIC EXCHANGE
The message from the top is clear: cut out coal. While the regulatory pressure has been evident for some time, the race to banish the black stuff s ...
Tuesday, 17 November 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.35 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 128.72 points Monday, up 0.35 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
|
|
|
Showing 731 to 735 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
|
| |
| |
|