We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 16 January 21
SEABORNE TRADE IN STEAM COAL DECREASED BY 11.6% FROM 937 MILLION TONNES IN 2019 TO 828 MILLION TONNES IN 2020 - COAL IMPORTERS ASSOCIATION, GERMANY
According to preliminary calculations by the German Coal Importers Association (Verein der Kohlenimporteure e. V.), global hard coal production dec ...
Friday, 15 January 21
OVER US$50 BILLION IN GAS POWER PROJECTS AND LNG IMPORT FACILITIES AT RISK OF CANCELLATION IN BANGLADESH, PAKISTAN AND VIETNAM - IEEFA
Pakistan and Bangladesh have already cancelled tenders for LNG imports
Emerging markets such as Vietnam, Pakistan and Bangladesh tha ...
Friday, 15 January 21
VIETNAM'S EXTRAORDINARY ROOFTOP SOLAR SUCCESS DEALS ANOTHER BLOW TO THE REMAINING COAL PIPELINE - IEEFA
9.3 gigawatts peak of solar capacity, equal to 6 coal power plants, installed in less than a year
Vietnam’s solar power indust ...
Friday, 15 January 21
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES UP - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price rose slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Thursday, 14 January 21
KOREA MIDLAND POWER INVITED BIDS FOR AUSTRALIAN COAL FOR THREE YEARS SUPPLY
COALspot.com: Korea Midland Power Co. Ltd, issued an International tender for total 1,560,000 MT of Min.5,700 kcal/kg NCV coal of Australian Origin ...
|
|
|
Showing 666 to 670 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
