We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 12 March 21
INDIA SHOULD FOCUS ON REDUCING COAL POWER GENERATION INSTEAD OF CAPACITY - IEEFA
Nearly half of existing coal power in India is more expensive than new renewable power
To get to its ambitious climate targets, Indi ...
Friday, 12 March 21
BATTERIES ARE REPLACING COAL NOT GAS - IEEFA
No amount of government subsidies can halt gas’s decline
Batteries are replacing coal not gas.
Today the early ...
Friday, 12 March 21
RENEWABLES SHOULD BE FOCUS OF VIETNAM’S DRAFT PDP8, NOT COAL AND GAS - IEEFA
Evidence was clear to inform the next stage of Vietnam’s power development
Vietnam’s recently published draft power deve ...
Thursday, 11 March 21
U.S. TO PRODUCE 581 MMST IN 2021, UP 8% FROM 2020 - EIA
EIA expects U.S. coal production to total 581 MMst in 2021, 42 MMst (8%) more than in 2020. In 2022, EIA expects coal production to rise by a furth ...
Thursday, 11 March 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Assessing the ship repair sector during the first months of 2021, we have come across a new era in which Owners chose the shipyards to repair their ...
|
|
|
Showing 621 to 625 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
|
| |
| |
|
