We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 04 November 09
BINANI HOPES TO BUY INDONESIAN COAL MINE IN 2-3 MONTHS
"We are still negotiating, but hope to conclude the deal in the next two to three months," Binani Cement Managing Director Vinod Juneja to ...
Tuesday, 03 November 09
CHINA TO BE NET COAL IMPORTER IN 2009
China is accelerating its importation of coal to cope with fallen output caused by the consolidation of small coalmines, and is likely to become a n ...
Monday, 02 November 09
RIO TINTO WARNS ON CHEAP MONGOLIAN COAL
The Age reported that, Mining giant Rio Tinto has warned that cheap coal from Mongolia as well as congestion at the Port of Newcastle in NSW could u ...
Monday, 02 November 09
ESSAR SEEKS COAL ASSETS IN SOUTH AFRICA
Paguntaka reported that, Essar Group plans to acquire coal assets in South Africa to help boost its power business in India. A senior executive of E ...
Sunday, 01 November 09
MINES REGULATION AMENDMENT BILL TO BE TABLED IN PARLIAMENT
Thaindia News reported that, A bill seeking to amend the Mines and Minerals Development Regulation Act, 1957, will be introduced in the winter sessi ...
|
|
|
Showing 6276 to 6280 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
|
| |
| |
|
