We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 31 October 09
FLSMIDTH WINS MAJOR INDIAN COAL HANDLING PROJECT
Top global supplier of minerals processing and materials handling equipment, FL smidth, has won another important coal handling contract in India
...
Saturday, 31 October 09
INDIA OPENING POWER SECTOR TO PRIVATE INVESTMENT, COAL STILL THE FUEL OF CHOICE
Energy Tribune reported that, With coal-fired power plants as the primary source, India’s electricity generation sector space has been dominat ...
Friday, 30 October 09
MINERS TOLD TO SPEND ON LOCAL SERVICE FIRMS
The energy and mineral resources ministry has issued a ministerial regulation ordering mining firms to prioritize hiring domestic service companies ...
Friday, 30 October 09
TATA POWER MAY BUY COAL FROM RIVERSDALE'S MOZAMBIQUE MINES
Bloomberg reported that, Tata Power Ltd., India’s biggest electricity generator outside state control, may buy coal from a mine in Mozambique ...
Thursday, 29 October 09
MMTC AWARDED 12.5 MILLION TONS TO THREE INDIAN TRADERS
COALspot.com (India): State-run trading firm MMTC awarded tenders for the import of 12.5 million tonnes of coal for NTPC to three Indian coal trader ...
|
|
|
Showing 6286 to 6290 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
|
| |
| |
|
