We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 01 November 09
THE COAL MOVEMENT TO INDIA FROM SOUTH AFRICA AND INDONESIA WOULD BE CONTINUE INCREASE - VISTAAR SINGAPORE
COALspot.com (Singapore): The BDI continued to be firm with an increase of 60 points and closed at 3,103 points.
The cape index also was firm an ...
Sunday, 01 November 09
INDONESIA ADARO Q3 NET PROFIT JUMPS ON COAL DEMAND
* Q3 net profit up 131.6 percent to 1.27 trillion rupiah
* Q3 revenue up 56.8 percent to 7.12 trillion rupiah
Reuters reported that, Indonesia' ...
Sunday, 01 November 09
PT INDIKA MAY BUY STAKES IN BHPB INDONESIA OPERATIONS
Dow Jones reported that Indonesian coal producer PT Indika Energy may buy stakes in BHP Billiton Limited's Indonesian coal operations and in local ...
Sunday, 01 November 09
ADAVALE RESOURCES MAKES COAL ACQUISITIONS IN INDONESIA
Adavale Resources Limited has entered into an agreement to acquire the rights to two thermal coal projects Tapan and Jambi in Sumatra Indonesia, hel ...
Saturday, 31 October 09
PRODUCERS BENEFIT FROM COAL'S TIGHT SUPPLY AND STRONG DEMAND
The Jakarta Post reported that, The outlook for Indonesian coal producers appears promising with strong volume growth coming from both the domestic ...
|
|
|
Showing 6281 to 6285 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Planning Commission, India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
