We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 07 November 09
THE STEAM COAL MOVEMENT FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA REMAINED QUITE STRONG - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com (Singapore): The BDI continued rising this week and was up by 290 points up by almost 9 pct and the index closed at 3,393 points.
B ...
Friday, 06 November 09
COAL INDIA ABANDONS PLAN TO BUY ASSET IN AUSTRALIA
Coal India’s efforts to acquire a mid-sized virgin thermal coal block from a private party in Australia have drawn a blank.
The effort was ...
Friday, 06 November 09
NEW ASSETS WILL INCREASE COKING AND THERMAL COAL PRODUCTION
Coal and metals processing company Coal of Africa Limited (CoAL) aims to produce 10-million tons a year of coking coal and two-million tons a year o ...
Friday, 06 November 09
NTPC TO APPOINT MERCHANT BANKER FOR S AFRICA COAL MINE
State-run power producer NTPC, which is eyeing coal mines in South Africa to meet the gap in domestic fuel supply, will appoint a merchant banker ne ...
Thursday, 05 November 09
MERCATOR LINES AIMS TO BECOME A $5 BILLION COMPANY
Mercator Lines, India’s second largest private sector shipping line, plans to invest and expand, riding India’s next wave of growth, the ...
|
|
|
Showing 6266 to 6270 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- White Energy Company Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
|
| |
| |
|