We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 13 February 10
COAL INDIA 2010/11 COAL IMPORTS TO JUMP - EXEC
Coal imports by state-run Coal India Ltd are likely to soar to 6-10 million tonnes in fiscal 2010/11 from an expected 1.5-1.7 million tonnes in the ...
Saturday, 13 February 10
RULES MAY FREE $10B OF MINING PROJECTS IN INDONESIA
The government announced on Friday that it had issued two implementing regulations for the new Mining Law that will clear the way for the developmen ...
Saturday, 13 February 10
INDONESIA OFFERS TAX INCENTIVES FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY
Indonesia is offering tax incentives to develop renewable energy projects, including geothermal energy, to cut dependency on fossil fuels, a decree ...
Friday, 12 February 10
MECHEL EYES 2010 COAL OUTPUT AT 28-29 MLN T
Russian steel and coking coal producer Mechel expects coal output to reach 28-29 million tonnes this year, returning to pre-crisis levels thanks to ...
Friday, 12 February 10
TATA POWER: QUARTERLY BLIP
Although the company’s revenues dipped in the December quarter, its long-term story is intact.
Lower power generation and realisations saw ...
|
|
|
Showing 6001 to 6005 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- White Energy Company Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Coal Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
