We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 16 February 10
KPMG PENS 6-POINT STRATEGY FOR COAL INDIA RESTRUCTURING
Coal India Ltd (CIL) has appointed KPMG Advisory Services Pvt Ltd to advise on consolidating its position as the country’s prime energy provid ...
Monday, 15 February 10
MINING LAW TO BE REVISED
Law No. 4 of 2009 on mineral and coal mining will be revised after a working visit of the Bangka Belitung (Babel) Provincial legislative assembly (D ...
Monday, 15 February 10
EURO COAL PRICES SOFTEN AS CHINESE LUNAR NEW YEAR HOLIDAYS START
Prices of prompt cargoes of coal for delivery into Europe weakened last week on a lack of European demand and market nerves over the possible impact ...
Monday, 15 February 10
INDONESIAN COAL SUFFERS SETBACK AS SUMATRA RAIL LINE HELD UP AGAIN
State-owned coal miner PT Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam’s $1.06 billion rail project in Sumatra faces more delays, and the cost of the project i ...
Monday, 15 February 10
MEC INFRA TO COMMISSION INDONESIA RAIL PROJECT
A joint venture between Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority (Rakia) RAK Investment Authority and Minerals Energy and Commodities Holdings, a f ...
|
|
|
Showing 5991 to 5995 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Planning Commission, India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
|
| |
| |
|