We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 10 February 10
ANGLO AMERICAN TIPS COAL PRICE RISE AFTER RAIN, AUSTRALIAN SAYS
Anglo American Plc expects coking coal contract prices to rise after weeks of heavy rain in Queensland state cut output by as much as 10 million met ...
Wednesday, 10 February 10
KANGAROO RESOURCES COMMENCES MINING AT MAMAHAK COKING COAL PROJECT
International coal producer Kangaroo Resources has kicked off mining at its second Indonesian coal operation, the Mamahak Coking Coal Project in Eas ...
Wednesday, 10 February 10
CHINA DENIES CLIVE PALMER'S COAL DEAL
ONE of China's biggest government-owned companies yesterday repudiated mining billionaire Clive Palmer for overstating what he said was Australia' ...
Tuesday, 09 February 10
INDIANS SAY SEEKING COAL BARGAINS VIA INDEX PRICES
* Indonesian cheaper than S.African - traders
* End-users wait for price falls before tendering
Indian coal traders responsible for the bulk of ...
Tuesday, 09 February 10
EURO COAL-PROMPT SLIDES WITH OIL PRICES
* April S.African cargo trades at $83.50/T FOB, unchanged
* April DES cargo trades at $74.75 a tonne, down $1/T
* Russia's Kuzbassrazrezugol sees ...
|
|
|
Showing 6011 to 6015 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
