We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 11 February 10
THE INDIAN MARKET SOFTENING A BIT - FEARNRESEARCH
Handy
The BSI has gone down for 3 weeks now but it is more a reflection of the Pac market. Activity in the Atl remains solid and rates remain firm ...
Thursday, 11 February 10
SOUTH AFRICA COAL EXPORTS DROP TO INDIA, CHINA
South African coal exports to India from Richards Bay Coal Terminal fell 39% in January from December's levels while shipments to China dropped 55% ...
Thursday, 11 February 10
JSW STEEL IS CLOSE TO ACQUIRING TWO COAL MINES IN THE US
“We are in advanced stages of negotiation and the deal will be completed in a month or two,” a company official told DNA Money on the co ...
Wednesday, 10 February 10
BHP TAKES MARUWAI SALE OFF THE TABLE, MINISTRY SAYS
Australian mining giant BHP Billiton may cancel a plan to sell a stake in its coal mining project in Maruwai, East Kalimantan, an official at the En ...
Wednesday, 10 February 10
JPMORGAN FORECASTS A 5.7% GROWTH IN SEABORNE IRON ORE SHIPMENTS, 3.8% FOR COAL AND GRAIN THIS YEAR
This year volumes of iron ore transportation by sea may grow to 5.7%, coal and grain up 3.8% over numbers in 2009, Ukrrudprom reports citing analyst ...
|
|
|
Showing 6006 to 6010 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Planning Commission, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
