We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 25 March 10
THE INDIAN MARKET IS STILL FIRM - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
A sluggish start to the week in the Atlantic with little fresh busin ...
Tuesday, 23 March 10
NINE COMPANIES WIN 20-YEAR COAL CONTRACTS - TEMPO
Tempo Interactive reported that, State Eletricity Company (Perusahaan Listrik Negara) revealed four joint ventures and one company winning coa ...
Monday, 22 March 10
INDONESIA`S MERUKH WINS US$3 BLN SWISS CONTRACT TO SUPPLY COAL - ANTARA
Antara Reported that, Indonesia's PT Merukh Enterprises said it has secured a 30-year contract to supply coal to Swiss buyer Glencore International ...
Monday, 22 March 10
INDIA TO IMPORT COLOMBIAN COAL FOR FIRST TIME AS DEMAND SURGES - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, Adani Enterprises Ltd., India’s biggest coal importer, agreed to buy thermal coal from Colombia for the first t ...
Saturday, 20 March 10
NO MAJOR CHANGES ON SUPRAMAX MARKET FOR NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: “The dry bulk freight market continued to be firm on the Panamax and Supramax and Handy size vessels”, said Capt. Reddy MD ...
|
|
|
Showing 5926 to 5930 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|