We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 19 March 10
COAL INDIA TO HIT CAPITAL MARKETS IN JULY
India’s largest coal producer, Coal India Ltd (CIL), expects to hit the capital markets by July, company chairman Partha S. Bhattacharyya said ...
Thursday, 18 March 10
COAL IMPORTS SOAR IN NANTONG PORT OF JIANGSU PROVINCE CHINA
BloombergUTV reported that, Coal imports at Nantong Port, located in coastal China's Jiangsu Province, soared 13 times to 581,000 tonnes in the fir ...
Thursday, 18 March 10
INNER MONGOLIA TO CAP COAL OUTPUT AT 700 MLN TONS IN 2010
Alibaba / China Knowledge reported that, Inner Mongolia, China's northern border autonomous region, plans to control coal output at 700 million ton ...
Thursday, 18 March 10
THE INDIAN MARKET WAS QUIET, BUT BECAUSE OF THE TIGHT TONNAGE SITUATION STILL FIRM - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
Activity continues to be solid in the Atlantic.
Supramax physical market is strong which pushed the BSI to a 17 month high at ...
Thursday, 18 March 10
INDONESIAN COAL PRODUCTION EXPECTED TO BEAT EARLIER FORECAST
The Jakarta Globe reported that, the government expects coal output this year to exceed its initial projection of 250 million metric tons as the dri ...
|
|
|
Showing 5931 to 5935 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The University of Queensland
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
