We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 30 March 10
PRICES FOR COKING COAL, IRON ORE TO SOAR AMID BURGEONING STEEL DEMAND: SCOTIABANK
Winnipeg Free Press reported that, Strong steel demand from China and a recovery in the developed world will push coking coal prices 56 per ce ...
Sunday, 28 March 10
DEMAND FROM INDIA RESHAPING THE GLOBAL COAL MARKET - DAVE FOREST
Attention international coal industry. There's a new kid on the block.
The nation of India.
India is emerging as a major re-shaping force for ...
Sunday, 28 March 10
SHIPS FROM WC INDIA TO CHINA CONTINUED TO BE FIXED AT HEALTHY LEVELS AT AROUND US$ 50/52,000 PER DAY - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: The dry bulk freight market seemed to be heading for a correction with all the indices dropping by 8-10 pct except for handy size whic ...
Saturday, 27 March 10
CHINA DROUGHT MAY RAISE COAL DEMAND, BOOST PRICES, CLSA SAYS - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, Droughts in southwest China may increase demand for coal used in power plants, and ‘support” prices in the &ldq ...
Saturday, 27 March 10
CHINA TO REMAIN NET COAL IMPORTER IN NEAR FUTURE - STEEL GURU
Xinhua News cited Mr Wu Chenghou a councilor with the China Coal Transportation and Marketing Association as saying that China will remain a net coa ...
|
|
|
Showing 5916 to 5920 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
