We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 26 March 10
CHINA PLANS TO INCREASES IMPORT COAL GREATLY IN 2010
– Asia Pacific Coal Trading & Investment Outlook 2010-
COALspot.com (Press Release): China plans to increase coal import significantly ...
Friday, 26 March 10
NTPC IN TALKS FOR INDONESIAN MINE - LIVE MINT
The deal for the coal mine with 1.8 bn tonnes of reserves may be valued at $1 bn
Live Mint reported that, State-run power utility NTPC Ltd is in ta ...
Friday, 26 March 10
ESSAR GROUP SIGNS DEAL FOR INDONESIAN COAL MINE - BUSINESS LINE
Looking ahead
The coal from the Indonesian mine would provide raw material to the group's power projects
The Aries coal mines acquired by the gro ...
Thursday, 25 March 10
CHINA RAILWAY WINS $4.8 BILLION INDONESIA PROJECT - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, China Railway Group Ltd. won a $4.8 billion order from PT Bukit Asam, Indonesia’s state-owned coal producer, for a co ...
Thursday, 25 March 10
INDIAS MAHARASHTRA SEEKS TO IMPORT 3.35 MILLION TONS OF COAL - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, Maharashtra State Power Generation Co., a provider of electricity to India’s commercial hub Mumbai, is seeking 3.35 m ...
|
|
|
Showing 5921 to 5925 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Planning Commission, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
