We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 01 April 10
PROFIT AT TWO INDONESIAN COAL MINERS SOARS AS RECOVERY STIRS GREATER DEMAND, HIGHER PRICES - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, Two of the country’s biggest coal producers enjoyed a surge in profit last year as prices rose and demand pic ...
Thursday, 01 April 10
BHP BILLITON TO SELL STAKE IN MARUWAI TO ADARO - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Posted reported that, BHP Billiton has agreed to sell 25 percent of its stake in the Maruwai Coal Project in Kalimantan to Indonesia&rsq ...
Thursday, 01 April 10
AUSTRALIAN COAL PRODUCER REJECTS $3 BILLION PEABODY OFFER - STL TODAY
STL today reported that, Australian coal producer Macarthur Coal Ltd. rejected a $3 billion cash takeover bid from Peabody Energy Corp., which seeks ...
Thursday, 01 April 10
TATA POWER EYES MORE COAL FROM INDONESIA FOR ITS FUTURE PLANTS - FINANCIAL EXPRESS
Financial Expressreported that, Tata Power, one of the largest private sector power utilities in the country with interests in generation, transmiss ...
Wednesday, 31 March 10
COAL INDIA MULLS JOINT VENTURE WITH RIO TINTO AND PEABODY - DNA
DNA reported that, Coal India Ltd. (CIL) has finalised two key contenders for its international joint venture (JV) in Australian and US each. The co ...
|
|
|
Showing 5906 to 5910 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Australian Coal Association
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
