We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 04 May 10
DRY BULK MARKET SOFTENING AGAIN ON LACK OF DIRECTION
The dry bulk market has put on the brakes once again, after the last session of the Baltic Dry Index ended at 3,354 points, down 5 from the previous ...
Monday, 03 May 10
AUSTRALIA PLANS 40 PERCENT TAX ON MINING PROFITS - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, Australia would heavily tax the booming profits of its mining companies under a tax system overhaul proposed Sunday ...
Saturday, 01 May 10
THE PERIOD ACTIVITY WAS QUITE FIRM DURING THE WEEK - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: The BDI was up by 11.32 pct which was mainly due to the firmness in capsize index which was up by 21.55 pct .
The other sectors Pan ...
Saturday, 01 May 10
EXPANDED SA COAL TERMINAL TO START OPERATIONS ON MAY 1 - MINING WEEKLY
Mining Weekly reported that, In line with expectations, the Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT) had completed the R1,2-billion Phase V expansion ...
Thursday, 29 April 10
SOUTH AFRICAN ROUNDS BACK TO INDIA SUPRAS CAN ACHIEVE AROUND MID 20S
Handy
Atlantic markets remain firm. Supramaxes open in USG are now achieving low/mid&n ...
|
|
|
Showing 5851 to 5855 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- MS Steel International - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PTC India Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
|
| |
| |
|
