We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 08 May 10
THE FUTURES FOR THREE YEARS (2010-2012) WAS AT AROUND PANAMAX / $ 21500 & SUPRAMAX / $ 18500 PER DAY - VISTAAR SHIPPING
COALspot.com: The BDI continued to go up and was up by 7.57 pct even though the stock markets was severely affected with worries on Greek debt crisi ...
Saturday, 08 May 10
MAHAGENCO TO IMPORT 3.35 MILLION TON OF COAL
COALspot.com: Indian utility Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd. is in market for 3.35 million tones of imported coal. The purchase of coal ...
Saturday, 08 May 10
NAPOCOR BUYS 122,000 TONS COAL - ABC CBN NEWS
ABC - CBN News reported that, State-run National Power Corp. (Napocor) said on Thursday it awarded 2 contracts for the supply of a total 122,000 ton ...
Saturday, 08 May 10
RICHARDS BAY COAL SHIPMENTS FALL TO AN 11-MONTH LOW - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, Coal shipments from Richards Bay Coal Terminal, Africa’s biggest export facility for the fuel, fell to an 11-month lo ...
Tuesday, 04 May 10
APRIL 2010 COAL PRICE REFERENCE WAS US$ 86.58/T FOB VESSEL
COALspot.com: The directorate general of mineral, coal and geothermal of Indonesia has publishing a monthly coal price reference (HBA) to be used by ...
|
|
|
Showing 5846 to 5850 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The University of Queensland
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Planning Commission, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|
