We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 13 May 10
ACTIVITY ON WEST COAST INDIA IS SLOWING - FEARNLEYS AS
DRY BULK CHARTERING
Handy
Atlantic markets remain firm but more for end May/beg June dates as there seems to be more enquiries for those dates. ...
Thursday, 13 May 10
DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS CHEERFUL AMID MARKET RALLY
China’s appetite for raw materials like iron ore and coal, as well as a series of added factors are boosting demand for dry bulk carriers, hel ...
Wednesday, 12 May 10
BANPU'S Q1 PROFIT SLIDES 43% TO B2.71BN - BANGKOK POST
The Bangkokpost reported that, Banpu Plc posted a first-quarter net profit of 2.71 billion baht, down by 43% from the same period last year.
The ...
Tuesday, 11 May 10
DALRYMPLE BAY COAL EXPORTS HIGHEST SINCE JULY; NEWCASTLE FALLS - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, Coal shipments from Australia’s Dalrymple Bay terminal in Queensland state rose to the highest in nine months in Apri ...
Tuesday, 11 May 10
DRY BULK RATES SHOOT UP ON STRONG CARGO DEMAND
The dry bulk industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) has kept its momentum, as predicted by analysts and shipping experts, managing t ...
|
|
|
Showing 5841 to 5845 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
|
| |
| |
|
