We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 20 April 11
TNPL SECURED 160K MT OF COAL WITH CALORIFIC VALUE 6000 GAD AT US$ 93.44 PMT
COALspot.com - Delhi based Knowledge Infrastructure Systems Pvt. Ltd once again offered the lowest price of US$ 93.44 per metric ton for calorific v ...
Wednesday, 20 April 11
TSI LAUNCHES GEO-COAL UPGRADING TECHNOLOGY
Simple yet effective process boosts calorific value of low rank coal to provide lower cost energy across the world.
Press Release - Total Sinergy ...
Wednesday, 20 April 11
ADARO TO PAY OUT RP 970B IN DIVIDENDS - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, the annual shareholders meeting of coal producer PT Adaro Energy on Wednesday agreed on the disbursement of Rp 970.7 ...
Wednesday, 20 April 11
INDIA IMPORTS MORE COAL FROM INDONESIA
COALspot.com - Indonesian coal exports jumped 23.31 percent during March 2011. The world’s largest coal exporter shipped 27, ...
Tuesday, 19 April 11
LONDON COMMODITY BROKERS OPENS JOHANNESBURG OFFICE
COALspot.com - London Commodity Brokers (LCB), a broking house specialising in bulk physical and Over-The-Counter commodities and options (coal ...
|
|
|
Showing 5296 to 5300 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The University of Queensland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
