We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 20 October 11
BRACKEN INTERNATIONAL MINING LISTS ON FRANKFURT STOCK EXCHANGE
Press Release - Bracken International Mining (Code:1BM) listed on the Deutsche Börse’s Frankfurt Stock Exchange today at €1.00 with ...
Thursday, 20 October 11
CAPESIZES, SUPRAMAXES LEAD GAINS FOR DRY BULK MARKET - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Struggling to find additional support, but still managing to post gains, the dry bulk market has stabilized itself on higher levels again yesterday, ...
Wednesday, 19 October 11
METALLURGICAL COAL PRICES TO DROP BELOW US$240/TONNE - WOOD MACKENZIE
Wood Mackenzie Says Metallurgical Coal Prices to Drop Below US$240/tonne by Q4 2012 But Long-term Demand Fundamentals Remain Robust
Wood Mackenzi ...
Wednesday, 19 October 11
SUPRAMAX MARKET WAS VERY FIRM LAST WEEK - BRS
With all sectors contributing positively, the BDI ended the week at 2,173 points (+8.6%), its highest level so far in 2011. The BCI stood at 3,587 ( ...
Wednesday, 19 October 11
ADARO ACQUIRES BUKIT ENIM ENERGI - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, Coal miner PT Adaro Energy Tbk, via its subsidiary dubbed PT Alam Tri Abadi, today revealed a 46% stake takeover of a ...
|
|
|
Showing 5021 to 5025 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
|
| |
| |
|
