We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 23 October 11
CHINA LOOKING TO RESELL INDONESIAN COAL CARGOES - BARCLAYS
Commodity Online reported that, Anecdotal evidence has suggested that China is even looking to resell Indonesian cargoes back into the seaborne coal ...
Saturday, 22 October 11
THE SHORT-PERIOD RATES FOR PANAMAX REMAINED FIRM - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com - "The market seemed to slow down a bit this week, and all sectors were down by about One to five percent", said Capt. Reddy, ...
Saturday, 22 October 11
WILL THE PROPOSED 26 PERCENT PROFIT SHARING CLAUSE IN THE MINING BILL SPEED UP THE PRODUCTION OR SCARE AWAY INVESTORS? - DIPESH DIPU
A draft law has been approved by a ministerial panel headed by Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee of India which, if passed by the Cabinet, will make ...
Saturday, 22 October 11
INDONESIA'S GOLDEN ENERGY SLASHES ITS IPO PRICE - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, Golden Energy Mines, a coal mining company affiliated with Sinar Mas Group, lowered its target in an initial public ...
Thursday, 20 October 11
CAPESIZE - TUBARAO /QINGDAO BEING FIXED AT STRONG US$ 29.75 PMT
Handy
The Atlantic market is quite steady, and market seems to be around the same levels as last week. Fewer fixtures reported though. ...
|
|
|
Showing 5016 to 5020 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
|
| |
| |
|
