We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 15 October 11
BENGAL COAL IMPORT TEST - THE TELEGRAPH
The Telegraph reported that, the power position in Bengal improved today but alarm bells are ringing over imported coal stocks that are running out ...
Friday, 14 October 11
CAPE DERIVATIVES MARKET HAS NOT REFLECTED OWNERS EXPECTATIONS' - FEARNBULK
Handy
The Atlantic market continued its upward trend, with fresh cargo entering the market. Skaw Passero to US Gulf climbed US$ 1500 from la ...
Friday, 14 October 11
ADARO BUYS SERVO MEDA FOR RP200 BIO - INSIDER STORIES
Insider Stories reported that, PT Adaro Energy Tbk (ADRO) announced that its subsidiary PT Alam Tri Abadi (ATI), acquired 35% stake in PT Serv ...
Thursday, 13 October 11
DRY BULK MARKETS RALLY CONTINUES, BUT ANALYSTS WARN IT WILL BE SHORTLIVED - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market continued its push forward yesterday, for yet another session, as the BDI (Baltic Dry Index), the industry’s benchmark edg ...
Wednesday, 12 October 11
INDONESIAS COAL RUSH - JOSEPH KIRSCHKE
COALspot.com - Last winter, the Chinese government mobilized thousands of soldiers and reservists of the People’s Liberation Army to the port ...
|
|
|
Showing 5031 to 5035 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
