We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 26 October 11
INDIAN MARKET WAS REMAINED TIGHT THE WHOLE LAST WEEK - BRS
The market once more seems to be at a crossroads. The indices last week remained fairly stable (except for the Panamax sector), ending the week as f ...
Tuesday, 25 October 11
DRY BULK MARKET STEADY, ANALYSTS LOOKING FOR ADDED PRESSURE ON THE MARKET - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market was unchanged on Monday, with the industry’s benchmark, the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) ending the session at 2,153 points, exa ...
Monday, 24 October 11
NEW HEAD OF INDONESIA'S MINING MINISTRY GETS RAKED OVER THE COALS - JOSEPH KIRSCHKE
COALspot.com - Following Indonesia’s presidential cabinet shakeup last week, many are questioning the qualifications of Energy and Mineral Res ...
Monday, 24 October 11
CHINA QINHUANGDAO COAL PRICE RISES TO HIGHEST IN THREE YEARS - BUSINESSWEEK
Business week reported that, China’s power-station coal price rose to the highest level in three years as power stations and central heating p ...
Monday, 24 October 11
CAPESIZE RENTAL RATES RISE FOR THIRD DAY AS MORE SHIPS HIRED - HELLENIC SHIPPING
Rates to hire capesize vessels advanced for a third day on signs of increased demand to transport iron ore, used to make steel.Daily rates for the s ...
|
|
|
Showing 5011 to 5015 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|