We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 27 October 11
CAPESIZE REACHING NEW HIGHS - FEARNLEYS
Handy
Pacific market has mixed sentiments with tonnages fixed at firm levels and some tonnages in feast failing on subs.For indo-india, large eco ...
Thursday, 27 October 11
DRY BULK MARKET EDGES DOWN AS CHINAS IRON ORE DEMAND LOSES GROUND - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
A plunge in Chinese iron ore demand, as a result of high steel inventories and a bleak outlook regarding steel prices, has prompted the dry bulk mar ...
Thursday, 27 October 11
BUKIT ASAM 3Q PROFIT SURGES 66.91%
Insider Stories reported that, the state-controlled coal miner PT Bukit Asam Tbk (PTBA) experienced a 66.91% increase in its net profit during a per ...
Wednesday, 26 October 11
MOODYS SEES MORE GROWTH FOR INDONESIAN COAL MINERS - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, Indonesia’s coal mining industry looks set to grow despite an uncertain global economic outlook, according to ...
Wednesday, 26 October 11
PWCS GLOBAL SHIPPING BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS: RECOVERY IN 2010 BUT GREAT UNCERTAINLY FOR 2011
The recovery of global trade in 2010 to the same levels as 2008 led to an improvement in the overall performance of shipping companies in 2010 compa ...
|
|
|
Showing 5006 to 5010 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- The University of Queensland
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
