We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 17 December 13
NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS UP 37.83% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 16, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.45 ...
Monday, 16 December 13
SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP LOST $ 0.53 IN A WEEK
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB) for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained $ 0.91 pmt month on month on Friday 13 December 2013 ...
Monday, 16 December 13
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL Q3' 14 DELIVERY PRICE CLOSED $1.63 LESSER THAN Q1' 14 PRICE
COALspot.com : API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q1’ 14 delivery gained 5.34 percept month on month as on Friday 13 December 2013. ...
Sunday, 15 December 13
SUPRAMAX'S FREIGHT RALLY COMES TO AN END THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI was up by 7 pct closing at 2,330 points week on week and the cape index was also up by 10.51 points and closed at 4,246 points ...
Friday, 13 December 13
HARD COAL : VOLUMES POSSIBLY AT RECORD-BREAKING HIGH; PRICES POSSIBLY AT A RECORD-BREAKING LOW - VDKI
Press Release : World Hard Coal Market 2013: volumes possibly at record-breaking high, prices possibly at a record-breaking low. German and UK impor ...
|
|
|
Showing 3951 to 3955 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The University of Queensland
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
